Schlagwörter
water quality, Indigenous water, spatio-temporal, hydrosocial, water governance, Belo Monte, Brazil, dams, national interest, hydropower, depoliticization, repoliticization, energy policy, international development, decentralization, political ecology, integrated water resource management (IWRM), Lesotho, Africa, Anishinabek, nibi (water), women, governance, giikendaaswin, urban water infrastructure, political ecology, water governance, water quality, packaged drinking water (PDW), bottled water, Jakarta, Indonesia, water management, irrigation, kitchen gardens, participatory development, Water Users’ Associations, Central Asia, Tajikistan, water governance, politics, law, decision-making processes, governmentalities, UNDRIP, free, prior and informed consent, FPIC, groundwater, environmental flows, environmental assessment, community-based research, drinking water, hydrosocial, Indigenous knowledge, settler colonialism, political ontology, risk, Two-Eyed Seeing, Yukon, Canada, water security, water ethics, narrative ethics, water justice, orientation knowledge, water governance, water politics, bottled water, water governance, urban water, re-theorizing, First Nations, OECD, water governance, water justice, water colonialism, UNDRIP, UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, water, desalination, legal geography, mining, Chile, first nations, Canada, political ecology, colonization, water politics, WEF Nexus, PES, scale politics, environmental justice, Latin America, Colombia, water politics, religious difference, infrastructure, governance, planning, practices of mediation, urban India, social control, participation, water governance, remunicipalization, Cochabamba, Bolivia, water governance, political ecology, Indigenous water governance, water rights, water insecurity, water justice, politics, water, infrastructure, informality, Cairo, Egypt, power, governance